Teaching Islam in America’s Junior High Schools

Regarding the teaching of Islam in Santa Barbara’s Junior Highs; I protest the use of, History Alive, The Medieval World and Beyond, because the book flat out teaches Islam to Junior High students in a public school.

Parents, look at this book. It’s 400 pages long and covers a wide swath of history. But when it arrives Islam, the text goes wobbly, gushing over Mohammed and his religious life for seven pages, fawning over Islam for 55 pages. Quote such as this are through out the text, stated as fact. “The horse then guided Mohammed through the seven levels of heaven, and then Mohammed met God”, and “But Gabriel spoke to Mohammed and told him , You are the messenger of God.”

These are clearly statements of proposed fact. To make such statements to a captive audience of 7th and 8th graders is flat out forbidden by our constitution. That was decided so thoroughly in the 1950’s Scopes Trial. A public school may not teach creationism. Therefore, it follows, a public school may not teach Islam. Period, end of argument. But let me continue.

Now in this same text book, for instances, the word Jesus appears twice, and both times it’s in the Muslim sec- tion of the book; Jesuits appears once, Mohammed appears on over twenty pages. I’m not saying we should have exact parity among Prophets in a public text book, but twenty to one is clearly disproportionate.

Furthermore, the main argument I put forward here, is that Junior High is no place for a religious studies class. The class is titled, Social Studies and I propose the class time not be used to foster Islam. If I wanted a Madrasa for my children I would send them to one, or at least the male children, if they were Muslim.

Sarcasm aside, it is well established, that public schools are no place for religious indoctrination. It seems clear this book goes too far in appeasing some imagined lack of tolerance by school children. I suspect, the reality is, the authors sought to ingratiate their book with educators, by bending over backwards for Islam, and slanting history against America’s Western Judaeo/Christian values and mores. Is that what it takes to get published now days?

Whatever the reason, public schools must remain non religious, and I certainly would not have expected an Is- lamic studies class, to masquerade as Social Studies.

Everyone has the answer to ISIS and Immigration. Well I have questions. Lots of them.

Since America has 50 million people on food stamps and 90 million unemployed, why do we need any immigrants at all? Are the roads not crowded enough? Are rents not high enough? Are we not running short of water? Do we need to cram every square inch with people. Don’t they have their own countries.

And why import terrorists when the rest of us locals have to bend over to get on a flight?? Why do non taxpaying foreigners suddenly get a free pass to the USA at our expense?

And why do we import oil from these terrorist supporting Saudis when we have ten times their reserves right here in the USA?

Why is our long term friend and protector of Christians in the Middle East Bashar Assad suddenly the enemy? The enemy of who? The American people? The American Government? And why does our government suddenly support Muslim terrorists if they attack Assad? Something is very fishy here.

Author Thomas M Cole

Trump Not Compare With Hitler…

Aghast at News Press lowering it’s high standards. What happened to a civil tone? A flurry of articles run by the NP comparing Donald Trump, perhaps the finest example of an American success story, to Hitler, Pol Pot, Lenin, Mao and even more disgraceful, John Edwards. That’s going too far. And today yet another from Reg Henry in the NP comparing the Donald to Mussolini this time. The left is running out of villains, and there’s no comparison.

If we were to highlight Obama’s church goings at Reverends Wrights white hate church, or point out Obama and Clinton (Hillary) are card carrying disciples of America hating leftist radical Saul Alinsky, can be certain the News Press wouldn’t print that because it’s not a civil tone, even though it’s true. Or is it only conservative views that are trashed here?

As for Donald Trump, he has solutions to America’s problems that resonate with can do Americans. Too many immigrants (30M Illegals) means close the border. Too many out of work (90M unemployed) means keep factories here, make better trade deals, tariff products dumped on the US and stop importing people!  Too much government interference with peoples lives means cut the government back, lower taxes and cut meaningless laws and regulations. Too much terrorism and wars means bomb the crap out of ISIS, win the war and maintain the peace.

These simple solutions are despised by leftists like Lee Rosenberg, and Reg Henry who believe only complex solutions from politicians, who have never accomplished anything in the real world, will help America. Plus Trump is not part of their cabal funded groupon, Clinton, Sanders, Biden… The Donald is not beholden to their masters on Wall Street.

The evidence is clear that political hacks can’t and won’t solve American problems, but the Rosenberg types want to play the Hitler card on Donald Trump, so predictable.

These leftist are determined to stay the course of high taxes, imploding debt, endless division and balkanization of the US people by playing on racist stereo types and demagoguing a non minority success story Donald Trump by any means. Even despicable means.

Author Thomas M. Cole

Attacking Trump- Same People Attacked Sarah Palin

Aghast at News Press lowering it’s high standards. What happened to civil tone?  Running an article that compares Donald Trump, perhaps the finest example of an American success story…to lets see, Hitler, Pol Pot, Lenin, Mao and even more disgraceful, John Edwards.

That’s going too far. This kind of hysterical racist hyperbole depicts just how fearful the left is of middle America and the Trump message.

In comparison if I were to recount Obama’s church going 20 years at Reverends Wrights America-haiting church,(G-d**n America)  or point out both Obama and Hillary are card carrying Saul Alinsky disciples, an America hating marxist radical,  would they be greeted with full page runs in the media? Unlikely? But if you’re reading this then we have a breakthrough.

As for Donald Trump, he has solutions to America’s problems that resonate with can do Americans. Too many immigrants (30M Illegals) means close the border. Too many out of work (90M unemployed) means keep factories here, make better trade deals, tariff products dumped on the US and stop importing people!  Too much government interference with peoples lives means cut the government back, lower taxes and cut meaningless laws and regulations. Too much terrorism and wars means bomb the beJesus out of ISIS, win the war and maintain the peace. And how about no more inane  politicians making bad trade agreements and dumb nuke treaties with Iran? Your Fired. This is what America wants. Working America. America first not last.

These simple solutions are despised by people who make Hitler comparisons. They instead believe only complex sounding solutions from politicians, who have never solved anything in the real world, are the right ones for America. The evidence is clear that political hacks can’t and won’t help America. But in responce these hysterical types want to play the Hitler card on Donald Trump, so predictable. All to place that lying tramp Hillary in office so WallStreet can keep on raping America.

People with these hysterical and vitriol laden views are determined to stay the course of high taxes, high government, imploding debt, endless wars, racial/class division and balkanization of the US.  Their method is to foist racist stereo types and demagoguery upon conservative success stories like Donald Trump and Sarah Palin. Even these despicable means are considered in good taste by todays left, showing a real lack of civility.

Author Thomas M. Col

Why Reg Henry is a Big Fat Communist

So were out of water; Cold Springs is a dried up poodle, there’s been wild fires, are there tame fires? According to Reg Henry it’s the conservative capitalists that have caused all this dryness. This is nothing new. The Communist party invented ecology as a method to control and eliminate private enterprise way back in the 1920’s.  I’ve got a 1910 photo of the Brooks estate in Montecito before it was built on. Nothing but dirt, not one plant, not one tree,  just a dry dirt hillside that today, is now covered with native oaks, exotic trees, shrubs and roses, which get attacked by gophers too often. This was not caused by private enterprise, it was a dry spell.

And did you know, that for nature to create one inch of soil in our foothills takes five hundred major fires. To calculate- At one major fire every 30 years, and four feet of soil on our ancient, barren hillsides, that means 12”x 4’ x 500 fires= 18,000 major wild fires  x  30 year fire interval = 720,000 years to make our backyard garden area. Now I’m not saying it hasn’t been hot or dry, but in the scheme of things, a few hot years, or wet years remembering 1998 produced 51” of rain in Montecito… doesn’t prove a short term trend against the weight of time. These wet and dry years and not caused by capitalism, or communism but are variations in temperature. The communists wish to control all production (money and power), and so they have their private media drive the current climate hysteria.

As for this conclusive scientific consensus about Hot Springs warming. From Forbes, That Scientific Global Warming Consensus…Not!

by Larry Bell, a Professor of space architecture, Larry says

“…31,000 American scientists…from diverse climate-related disciplines, including more than 9,000 with Ph.D.s have signed a public petition…there is no convincing scientific evidence that human release of carbon dioxide, will cause catastrophic heating of the Earth’s atmosphere and disruption of the Earth’s climate.” Well that settles that. Not everyone is on board the dried up Hot Springs train.

Larry goes on to point out the canard that 98.7 of earth scientists agree to global warming as fact. He shows this allegation was manufactured from a jaundiced two minute email survey, that ultimately represented 75 scientists opinions, as a consensus.

Not that scientific I’d say, but relied upon by grant hungry government scientists as the definitive study. It’s a good factual article and if you believe that, don’t apply for any new grants.

Liberal Religions Coming Home To Roost

Liberal Religion Comes Home To Roost

So much of liberal thought has now become a religion. Global warming, abortion and immigrant rights are the new trinity and god help the patriot who crosses this line. It’s blasphemy to question these liberal religious doctrines.

As an example, what happened to the old liberal mantra of shrinking your carbon footprint. This was to imply that us wasteful Americans use to much carbon. But the real reason has nothing to do with carbon and more to do with Liberal religious propaganda.

The new religious litany says; since carbon use causes global warming, and warming will kill the polar bears and destroy the planet, we must cut back. And America listened. We listened so well that many American women got the message we’ve been living too high on the hog, and it hasn’t been fair to the worlds peoples, and they are mad at us, because they don’t have it so good. And so white women simply stopped having babies, all in the name of the new religion of the left. Hail the global warming god….

Because of liberal propaganda to make America guilty of eco-sin, we have a dearth of children… but this will be good because now we can stop using so much carbon. But lo and behold what the libs have wrought. Instead of Americas population shrinking, it’s governments, schools and prisons shrinking, the opposite happened. Things in America are more crowded than ever. Well surprise surprise.

Turns out the government made sure this fine act of religious piety, the giving up of procreation for the liberal carbon god, has been countered by government which turned around and flooded the country with indigenous Indians from Mexico. It also turns out that drug importing Mexico, extreme racist, drug pushing, cartel ruled, Spain centric Mexico sent their unwanted indigenous peoples to America, and most of them were pregnant. Mexico has government programs telling how to leave and how to play the USA for room and board. Naturally the liberal religion of immigration says we must foster and welcome all immigrants with no discernment and no questions.

So now Santa Barbara, and American jails, schools, housing and DMV’s are filled to the gills with little indians from Mexico. Our carbon footprint is bigger than ever! While teachers, prison guards, police, courts and welfare workers are again fully employed keeping the single family indians in and out of the jail, court and welfare systems. Housing is again in short supply, taxes on the wealthy and middle class are going up again to ever more confiscatory levels. Whole neighborhoods are now indian nations with the state providing all services on the taxpayers bill. Government spends nearly $170 million per year on housing subsidies (5000 units), Jails, court services, education and welfare for our new friends.

Really it’s a wonder government couldn’t find any Americans that wanted to live in Santa Barbara. There must be a few Americans somewhere in the country that would appreciate a new place to live with full benefits. What about American Indians, shouldn’t they have a place here in Santa Barbara?

Now you Liberals, do we have to believe your insane religious theories? Aren’t your theories really just diabolical ways of growing government, overwhelming native classes and gathering new placid democrat voters into America? Or do you actually believe your own religious doctrines? The reason liberals tell Americans not to have children is to save the environment, or is it really so the government can import children from poor countries to create new dependents and new socio/political classes? Which one is it? We will know when social workers are in the streets handing out birth control sacraments to immigrants, yet somehow that never happens as it would be deemed genocide.

You see religion hasn’t gone away, even for liberals. In fact American liberals are more consumed by their religion than sword wielding Shia fanatics on camels. In modern times, religion has become politics and liberals are Henry the 8th… insisting we swear allegiance to their insane religions, and then die off. This is the truth and the way… Next we’ll be told unemployment is 5%.

Thomas M. Cole JD

New Fish in an Old Lake

In partial response to Reg Henry’s and so many other liberal pieces on alleged conservative fantasy, ill feelings, beliefs and mimes like the President is a Marxist from Kenya, warm weather doesn’t indicate global warming, or that 360 million people in the USA is possibly enough.

Where to begin, what an idiot… Reg Henry with his servile smugness couched in quaint homilies seethes with home spun venom. And clearly the left follows this line of thought about conservatives and so I feel compelled to inform the left what conservatives really think, and the word is to think.

In this pass I shall discuss immigration in terms that the liberal mind may follow. Consider the fish.

Say you’re a fish who lives in a lake, and for many generations your families of fishes have resided in the lake. We might even say you’re a native fish. Now another small group of bureaucrat fish in a nearby lake come along and announce they have decided there is a real need to import fish from another far away lake into your lake.

These far away fish are not like you and your fish. They were raised differently, look and act differently than you and your family fish. But it has already been decided that for the good of a newly minted political slogan diversity, your lake will accept these fish without question or discussion.

Your group of native fishes get together and complain that these new fishes will cause problems for the lake and it’s indigenous population, and that the new fish will use up all resources, create overcrowding and pollution in the lake. Your group of fishes even questions the need for any more fish in the lake when things are already crowded enough, in your view.

You argue that these new fish come from regions that have already destroyed their own lakes with eternal raging wars, virulent religious and sport fishing tournaments, unsettled and intractable national characters and they will simply bring these problems with them to your peaceful and settled lake regions.

The response from the bureaucrat fish is not positive. By prearranged signal, you and your conservative fish are accused of fishism and of being fishists and fish firsters. The fish newspapers are strangely silent on the issue of preserving native fish culture… but completely attack the conservative fish that wish to be left alone and keep their peaceful steady lake as it is.

It turns out that another group unbeknownst to all, harvests fish from the lakes and owns the newspapers and all lake media and government. This harvesting group is behind the push to flood the lake with new, faster breeding, better tasting, easier to catch and more docile fish.

The bureaucrat fish are on the payroll of this behind the scenes harvesting group, and the bureaucrats now double down the importation of foreign fish. They start giving the new fish free passes at the best feeding areas and extra good rock sites to live at. Soon the native fish are at a disadvantage and begin fighting with the newly imported foreign fish. The lake is in turmoil as all fish are now fighting for territory, food and survival. Through out the lake, the fish movies, twitter, video and news accounts are filled with degrading depictions of native fishes and their imagined and self serving plight. Native fish are shown in countless disparaging scenes as unfriendly, selfish, greedy and uncaring while the newly imported fish are depicted as noble, caring, hardworking and worthy of all the lakes resources.

Soon the lake is at a fever pitch and few are noticing the great nets extracting huge numbers of fish for harvest. The lake is now producing more for the harvesting class than ever before. The harvesters do not care if they eat native or imported fish, as long as they eat.

So there you see, is the conservatives view of why we want to conserve our lake. Conservatives may be said to be conservative in views and wish to preserve and protect existing environs.

Liberals hopefully will recognize these themes of native rainbow trout verses foreign importation and  invasive species. These concepts are easy to understand if you’re a fish happy in your own lake…


Thomas M. Cole JD  aka Mr Fish…